The Zapless Pic
Hope you can answer my question, because I can't get anyone else to! I have a Canon Digital SLR, and my pics look good, but they don't have that clear, almost perfect "zap." What is that zap, and how do I achieve it? Can I get it with Photoshop?
Thanks so much,
Zapless Photos
***
Dear Zapless,
The first thing I'm wondering is: How's your lens? Because the better quality lens you use, the more likely your pictures will be sharp and beautiful.
But I suspect you can do something in Photoshop to get that zappy look you crave. The more contrast, saturation, and sharpness your pictures have, the more punch they'll probably pack. Take a look at these before & afters:
I shot this in RAW, and processed the above picture with the As Shot settings, doing no tweaking at all. It looks good, but it sure ain't zappy.
In this version, I bumped up the contrast big time, and added a bit of brightness and saturation. Then, in Photoshop, I used Smart Sharpen to add some sharpness.
Is that the kind of Zap you were after?
All my best, and good luck,
Debbie






The very first thing i do is the LEVELs thing... ensuring that the left and right sliders are touching the outside points of that big black mountain of a curve... THEN i will play with the rest.. and sometimes,just a levels tweak will do !
Posted by: stephen rudolph | October 11, 2006 at 08:08 PM
Debbie,
Great job, I look forward every month to your column in Pop Photo ~
They need an issue "Debbie's Tips."and you need a book on Photoshop. I would buy either one in a heart beat ~ especially in the $30+ range.
Love your tips
Uncle Gus
82 going on 18
Posted by: Gus Hallgren | October 11, 2006 at 08:40 PM
Debbie, I save all my issues just so I can refer back to all your hints with Photoshop. My biggest frustration comes with eliminating backgrounds. I typically mask and remove, but this is time consuming and the edges are sometimes rough. There must be a better way! Any suggesions?
Thanks,
LB
Posted by: LB | October 11, 2006 at 09:05 PM
Debbie, how do you reconcile your advice on this photo to your advice some weeks ago? Specifically:
"Dear Dumbfounded,
The Brightness and Contrast sliders may be slightly less work, but they sure are sloppy. Yeah, Brightness brightens, but it casts an ugly fog over your images. Try to correct it with Contrast, and you’ll soon lose shadow and highlight detail. Try it yourself, and compare your results to changes you make with Curves or Levels. I suspect you'll abandon those seemingly-slick sliders in no time."
Keen to read your comments.
Best,
Bill
Posted by: Bill Gillies | October 12, 2006 at 12:36 AM
Bill, don't be too harsh. I too read Zapless' post as someone fairly new to imaging. With that being the case, I have to agree that Debbie shows Zapless how to walk before running.
Posted by: Mike Jackson | October 13, 2006 at 11:34 AM
"My biggest frustration comes with eliminating backgrounds"
Try shooting at night, LB. With a flash. (And now slow-speed sync, either.)
Or maybe pose your subject on the edge of a cliff, and shoot from a low angle.
Posted by: zyxwvutsr | October 13, 2006 at 11:51 AM
Bill -
I think the advice for Dumbfounded was for the sliders in PS, while she only SmartSharpens in PS for 'Zapless'. The other tweaks for Zapless were done against the RAW file - presumably in Adobe Bridge.
Posted by: JDR3 | October 17, 2006 at 03:57 PM
My humble opinion: brightness and contrast sliders can help some very bad pictures, but most of times you will benefit more using the curves tool, specially if you fine tune the curve for every picture - usually they come with very low contrast from the camera.
About bad lenses: I have sharp, fixed lenght and fast lenses, and also camera-kit for every situation zoom lenses. I use them both. Although they obviously have different results in sharpness and "zapfulness", nothing beats the use of a perfect light, during the right time of the day, or even using your speedlight properly.
Posted by: Luciano | October 18, 2006 at 08:07 PM
Hey,
Read Debbie's post again. She uses the Brightness and Contrast in Adobe Raw Converter, not Photoshop.
In the raw converter, using those adjustments keeps the changes within photographic parameters. You definitely cannot say that about Brightness/Contrast in Photoshop. It's there for graphic requirements, not photographic.
A word of caution re: Debbies advice to increase zap is all good but probably the most common digital photography mistake is to super-saturate and hyper-contrast photographs. Destroy tone and detail at your peril!
Posted by: Adrian Malloch | October 20, 2006 at 01:32 AM
FOR ZAP
1) Levels: drag black point to edge of histogram; exit
2) Unsharp Mask: amount 25%, radius of (pick one to taste) 7.5,15,30,60, threshold of 0; exit
3) Reopen levels: drag white point toward histogram, to taste, but be careful not to blow anything out (red chennel is the one that always gets me in trouble)
Posted by: ghw3 | October 20, 2006 at 03:19 AM
Images I print are darker than what I see on my monitor. What can I do to correct this? Monitor specifications-Contrast ratio-1000:1;Brightness-300 cd/m2;Resolution 1600x1200; Video input-DVI. I am using PhotoShop CS2.
Thanks for taking the time.
"Still learning"
Posted by: George Lovelace | October 24, 2006 at 11:06 PM
Debbie, I was trying to use your "The Ultimaste Test Strip" discussed Volume 70, NO. 5; May 2006, page38.I was doing great until step 6. It said to "click and drag your Adjustment Layer onto your original". I dragged the layer over the original image I wanted to print and it showed the "stop icon(circle with a diagonal line). nothing happened. What did I miss? Please help. Thanks for your time.
"Still Learning"
Posted by: George Lovelace | October 24, 2006 at 11:19 PM
LB,
She never said she used Contrast/Brightness tool. You can add contrast/brightness by Levels or Curves. I'm sure she was talking about those.
Regards
Posted by: Afshin | October 27, 2006 at 02:51 PM
George Lovelace,
I didn't steal your name! Debbie did!! I posted the above comment but it appears to be posted under George's name!!!!
Posted by: Afshin | October 27, 2006 at 03:23 PM